I would be happy even with a variety of hacks : most of these functions are one-liners. Is there some way to just post the function definition in the documentation ? Either in the object title or in the documentation below ? I can do this by hand but then the documentation does not automatically track changes in the code. Any ideas ?
--mrule On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Michael Rule <[email protected]> wrote: > Something like 80% of this library I am trying to document isn't > declared with the traditional "def" syntax. I've figured out that > Sphinx can produce reasonable documentation if I include a > triple-quote string after the function declaration, but its not > picking up arguments properly. Is there some way to the nice foo(a,b) > format you get with def for functions declared as lambda functions ? > You could even guess curried functions, if foo = lambda x:lambday:x+y > then you could output foo(x)(y) in the documentation. Anyway, does > anyone have any good ideas besides re-writing the entire library with > "def" notation ? > > --mrule > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en.
