On 2011-12-01, Friedrich Romstedt wrote:
> 2011/11/30 Olivier Bonaventure <[email protected]>:
> I tried once to write my Dipoma thesis in Sphinx, because I thought
> the same as you do. But I switched back to LaTeX later, rewriting all
> the stuff again. The reasons are that Sphinx/Docutils is nice for
> HTML documentations of Programs, but the functionality just lacks some
> ingredients of LaTeX I really like and miss then:
What I miss most, is citation management with a database like bibtex.
> 1) Spanning paragraphs over equations. Paragraphs are in Docutils a
> nonstructured entity. In depends on the point of view if this is a
> design mistake or not. For the Sphinx purpose, it might be not, for
> the (e)paper document it probably is. I do not think we would like to
> discuss this here again, just to point it out.
There is the "compound" directive in reStructuredText:
The "compound" directive is used to create a compound paragraph, which
is a single logical paragraph containing multiple physical body
elements such as simple paragraphs, literal blocks, tables, lists,
etc., instead of directly containing text and inline elements. For
example::
.. compound::
The 'rm' command is very dangerous. If you are logged
in as root and enter ::
cd /
rm -rf *
you will erase the entire contents of your file system.
-- http://docutils.sf.net/docs/ref/rst/directives.html#compound-paragraph
> 3) Maths as PNGs (if not using JSMath, what is not an option for
> ebook readers) not properly aligned in inline text mostly.
Since version 0.8, Docutils supports math with MathML and HTML+CSS output
options in HTML. (I don't know how good these work in ePub, though.)
http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/directives.html#math
Günter
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sphinx-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en.