Hi -- We've been using replacements to standardize references to downloadable PDFs and other media in our documentation, e.g.:
.. |whitepaper| replace:: :download:`our technical whitepaper </iReport-Technical-Whitepaper.pdf>`. I've noticed that this results in some fairly involved markup being generated for the link text that is both verbose and IMHO unnecessarily uses monospace formatting in an old-school teletext tag: <tt class="xref download docutils literal"> <span class="pre">our</span> <span class="pre">technical</span> <span class="pre">whitepaper</span> </tt> I can probably work around this with some CSS, but I was wondering if this was by design (using monospace fonts to label downloads) or a left-over from when most referenced downloads were likely OS filenames (vs Titles or other non-technical text)? Similar, I'm curious if there is a benefit to splitting the title into separate spans vs one long one. Ramon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-dev" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sphinx-dev/-/C48mA-pKe90J. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en.
