Hi Ron, Hi everyone,
I had some similar requirements in the past and therefor created the
sphinx-extension "Sphinx-Collections".
https://sphinx-collections.readthedocs.io/
It is in beta status and I'm not sure if it covers all of your needs as
your project setup sounds quite complex.
However, Sphinx-Collections collects files and folders from different
locations and puts them in the source folder.
These files/folders can be created based on a path, a string, a jinja file,
a python function, git repo and some more.
There is also a directive available, with "activates" rst content only, if
a related collection has been used/integrated during the build:
.. if-collection:: my_test, my_data
.. toctree::
/_collections/my_test/index
The needed collections get normally activated by using a configurable
sphinx-tag in the current sphinx-build call.
Then the extension collects the data before the build starts and
cleans/erases the collected data afterwards, so that for instance the git
working tree stays clean.
I would be happy, if you can give it a try and get in contact with me, if
anything is missing or not working.
Ron Stone schrieb am Freitag, 3. September 2021 um 14:44:46 UTC+2:
> I am currently working on a project that is attempting to ‘blend’ rst
> files from four separate git repos into arbitrary doc sets. Each repo
> represents a set of product documentation with its own tox/sphinx
> environment. We do this by, for example, symlinking a doc from repo A into
> B at runtime and using a combination of substitutions and include files to
> handle most customizations.
>
> It can get complicated. Sometimes we need to cross link files and modify
> indexes, sometimes we want to add a document, but without certain files or
> sections. Sometimes we need to link just a subset of files or a single file
> from one repo into another. In some cases we need to link a doc from A (an
> open source product) to C (a proprietary version) and then ‘add’ some
> proprietary files to the linked content. Cross linking between repos is
> achieved using intersphinx, but since one repo is hosted by an ‘upstream’
> open source partner, but contains content pulled into different downstream
> repos, we parse objects.inv from that project and modify local copies of
> the source files with the appropriate intersphinx tags.
>
> We run sphinx with the -W flag, so builds are picky about having exactly
> the .rst files required - and no more - in scope at build time.
>
> This works, but I am looking for a cleaner approach. Two alternatives may
> be:
>
> - Create a ‘meta’ repo from the four current repos and use it as a
> single source of content for builds. Since this would expose unused
> content
> to the builds, we would turn -W off and instead read build output into a
> loop, choosing which warnings to fail on.
> - Create a ‘meta’ repo from which we would pull the content required
> for a given build into a sphinx instance in a different location outside
> the repos, allowing us to continue to run strict builds (-W) and exposing
> only the artifacts required for a given build to sphinx.
>
> Has anyone dealt with a situation like this before? From my experience,
> Sphinx is not really intended to be used in a CMS type context, where a
> superset of content is mixed and matched into different subset
> configurations for different builds. Are we missing something about its
> behaviour that would allow a simpler approach? If not, has anyone come up
> with alternatives to the two options above or have experience with either?
>
> Thanks!
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sphinx-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sphinx-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sphinx-users/563b7fa7-e5b4-4f3d-b90b-d93c27e69a97n%40googlegroups.com.
