Dear David,
> Related:
>
> - It's probably worth removing support for the SSFRM
> mechanism and requiring gpio_cs or (at least as a
> transitional scheme) the cs_control() thing.
I disagree strongly with this.
By all means issue a warning that cs_change will be
effectively 1 in all cases. However, with many real setups
this is absolutely fine. Leave getting this right to a
combination of the board config writers and some good
documentation!
> I suggest issuing a strong warning for all devices
> which assume the SSFRM mechanism (single device
> on the bus segment too) ... and maybe a weaker one
> if they use cs_control, saying "use gpio_cs".
>
> - Remove the gpio_cs_inverted thing ... that's exactly
> what SPI_CS_HIGH is there to handle (in spi->mode).
>
> The SSFRM issue is, briefly, that it forces deselect
> of the chip between transfer segments even when the
> driver doesn't want that. If it's not disabled, the
> transfer() routine needs integrity checks to make
> sure it rejects all messages that don't expect that
> deselection (unless cs_control/gpio_cs is used for
> that particular spi_device).
>
> The cs_control issue is more just simplification: as
> I recall, all users are just wrapping GPIOS, and giving
> up potential SPI_CS_HIGH support while doing it.
Whilst no one may currently be doing anything other than
wrapping a gpio, are there really no foreseeable reasons
to do it another way?
One classic possibility that comes to mind is some chips are
quite happy not to have the chip select switched at all.
Obviously this is only sensible on single chip connected
to the bus situations, but then for high performance stuff
that's all that ever seems to happen anyway!
--
Jonathan Cameron
>
>
> ============
> From: "Eric Miao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Most SPI peripherals use GPIOs as their chip select, introduce .gpio_cs
> for this, to avoid
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/pxa2xx_spi.h | 1 +
> drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c | 92
> ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/pxa2xx_spi.h
> b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/pxa2xx_spi.h
> index 2206cb6..b87cecd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/pxa2xx_spi.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/pxa2xx_spi.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct pxa2xx_spi_chip {
> u8 dma_burst_size;
> u32 timeout;
> u8 enable_loopback;
> + int gpio_cs;
> void (*cs_control)(u32 command);
> };
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c b/drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c
> index 34c7c98..98d2338 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
>
> #include <asm/io.h>
> #include <asm/irq.h>
> @@ -164,6 +165,8 @@ struct chip_data {
> u8 enable_dma;
> u8 bits_per_word;
> u32 speed_hz;
> + int gpio_cs;
> + unsigned gpio_cs_inverted : 1;
> int (*write)(struct driver_data *drv_data);
> int (*read)(struct driver_data *drv_data);
> void (*cs_control)(u32 command);
> @@ -171,6 +174,32 @@ struct chip_data {
>
> static void pump_messages(struct work_struct *work);
>
> +static void cs_assert(struct driver_data *drv_data)
> +{
> + struct chip_data *chip = drv_data->cur_chip;
> +
> + if (chip->cs_control) {
> + chip->cs_control(PXA2XX_CS_ASSERT);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (gpio_is_valid(chip->gpio_cs))
> + gpio_set_value(chip->gpio_cs, chip->gpio_cs_inverted);
> +}
> +
> +static void cs_deassert(struct driver_data *drv_data)
> +{
> + struct chip_data *chip = drv_data->cur_chip;
> +
> + if (chip->cs_control) {
> + chip->cs_control(PXA2XX_CS_DEASSERT);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (gpio_is_valid(chip->gpio_cs))
> + gpio_set_value(chip->gpio_cs, !chip->gpio_cs_inverted);
> +}
> +
> static int flush(struct driver_data *drv_data)
> {
> unsigned long limit = loops_per_jiffy << 1;
> @@ -187,10 +216,6 @@ static int flush(struct driver_data *drv_data)
> return limit;
> }
>
> -static void null_cs_control(u32 command)
> -{
> -}
> -
> static int null_writer(struct driver_data *drv_data)
> {
> void __iomem *reg = drv_data->ioaddr;
> @@ -398,7 +423,6 @@ static void giveback(struct driver_data *drv_data)
> msg = drv_data->cur_msg;
> drv_data->cur_msg = NULL;
> drv_data->cur_transfer = NULL;
> - drv_data->cur_chip = NULL;
> queue_work(drv_data->workqueue, &drv_data->pump_messages);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drv_data->lock, flags);
>
> @@ -407,7 +431,9 @@ static void giveback(struct driver_data *drv_data)
> transfer_list);
>
> if (!last_transfer->cs_change)
> - drv_data->cs_control(PXA2XX_CS_DEASSERT);
> + cs_deassert(drv_data);
> +
> + drv_data->cur_chip = NULL;
>
> msg->state = NULL;
> if (msg->complete)
> @@ -493,7 +519,7 @@ static void dma_transfer_complete(struct driver_data
> *drv_data)
> /* Release chip select if requested, transfer delays are
> * handled in pump_transfers */
> if (drv_data->cs_change)
> - drv_data->cs_control(PXA2XX_CS_DEASSERT);
> + cs_deassert(drv_data);
>
> /* Move to next transfer */
> msg->state = next_transfer(drv_data);
> @@ -605,7 +631,7 @@ static void int_transfer_complete(struct driver_data
> *drv_data)
> /* Release chip select if requested, transfer delays are
> * handled in pump_transfers */
> if (drv_data->cs_change)
> - drv_data->cs_control(PXA2XX_CS_DEASSERT);
> + cs_deassert(drv_data);
>
> /* Move to next transfer */
> drv_data->cur_msg->state = next_transfer(drv_data);
> @@ -868,7 +894,6 @@ static void pump_transfers(unsigned long data)
> }
> drv_data->n_bytes = chip->n_bytes;
> drv_data->dma_width = chip->dma_width;
> - drv_data->cs_control = chip->cs_control;
> drv_data->tx = (void *)transfer->tx_buf;
> drv_data->tx_end = drv_data->tx + transfer->len;
> drv_data->rx = transfer->rx_buf;
> @@ -1020,7 +1045,7 @@ static void pump_transfers(unsigned long data)
> * this driver uses struct pxa2xx_spi_chip.cs_control to
> * specify a CS handling function, and it ignores most
> * struct spi_device.mode[s], including SPI_CS_HIGH */
> - drv_data->cs_control(PXA2XX_CS_ASSERT);
> + cs_assert(drv_data);
>
> /* after chip select, release the data by enabling service
> * requests and interrupts, without changing any mode bits */
> @@ -1098,6 +1123,43 @@ static int transfer(struct spi_device *spi, struct
> spi_message *msg)
> /* the spi->mode bits understood by this driver: */
> #define MODEBITS (SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA)
>
> +static int setup_cs(struct spi_device *spi, struct chip_data *chip,
> + struct pxa2xx_spi_chip *chip_info)
> +{
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + if (chip_info == NULL)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* NOTE: setup() can be called multiple times, possibly with
> + * different chip_info, previously requested GPIO shall be
> + * released, stumped :(
> + */
> + if (gpio_is_valid(chip->gpio_cs))
> + gpio_free(chip->gpio_cs);
> +
> + if (chip_info->cs_control) {
> + chip->cs_control = chip_info->cs_control;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + if (gpio_is_valid(chip_info->gpio_cs)) {
> + err = gpio_request(chip_info->gpio_cs, "SPI_CS");
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(&spi->dev, "failed to request CS GPIO%d\n",
> + chip_info->gpio_cs);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + chip->gpio_cs = chip_info->gpio_cs;
> + chip->gpio_cs_inverted = spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH;
> +
> + gpio_direction_output(chip->gpio_cs, !chip->gpio_cs_inverted);
> + }
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> static int setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> {
> struct pxa2xx_spi_chip *chip_info = NULL;
> @@ -1141,7 +1203,7 @@ static int setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> - chip->cs_control = null_cs_control;
> + chip->gpio_cs = -1;
> chip->enable_dma = 0;
> chip->timeout = 1000;
> chip->threshold = SSCR1_RxTresh(1) | SSCR1_TxTresh(1);
> @@ -1156,9 +1218,6 @@ static int setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> /* chip_info isn't always needed */
> chip->cr1 = 0;
> if (chip_info) {
> - if (chip_info->cs_control)
> - chip->cs_control = chip_info->cs_control;
> -
> chip->timeout = chip_info->timeout;
>
> chip->threshold = (SSCR1_RxTresh(chip_info->rx_threshold) &
> @@ -1238,13 +1297,16 @@ static int setup(struct spi_device *spi)
>
> spi_set_ctldata(spi, chip);
>
> - return 0;
> + return setup_cs(spi, chip, chip_info);
> }
>
> static void cleanup(struct spi_device *spi)
> {
> struct chip_data *chip = spi_get_ctldata(spi);
>
> + if (gpio_is_valid(chip->gpio_cs))
> + gpio_free(chip->gpio_cs);
> +
> kfree(chip);
> }
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
spi-devel-general mailing list
spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
