On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 05:50, Robin Getz wrote: > On Tue 1 Sep 2009 23:17, Song, Barry pondered: >> No. I can't agree other coding style issues you said. I will keep my >> original codes for these issues except adding a BUS_SPI. > > style is different than performance.... > > Did you think about Mike's comment - I think it was a performance issue he was > talking about.
if we do go the proper approach and handle spi/i2c dynamically as suggested, then this is a moot point as we'll want to keep the function pointers -mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
