> >I'd have it expire in 2 years also... basicly a ping to take them off the
> >email lists if they don't respond...
> Then you have to define what happens when a contributing memebr slips into
> non contrib. I think this way is easy, and really see no need to remove
> inactive supporting members. Otherwise I'd me for a longer term (4-5
> years possibly).
Perhaps it's time to address the issue of whether we'll have the
(hu)manpower needed to manually reinstate a member every year. I know that
some of this could be automated, but the automation will inevitably
require a responsible, quick-to-reply set of maintainers, in much the same
way as the debian new-maintainer list does.
Will
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| http://www.cis.udel.edu/~lowe/ |
| PGP Public Key: http://www.cis.udel.edu/~lowe/index.html#pgpkey |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| You think you're so smart, but I've seen you naked |
| and I'll prob'ly see you naked again ... |
| --The Barenaked Ladies, "Blame It On Me" |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
