Christoph Lameter wrote: > It is best if the donor has to give complete control over what happens to > the equipment. At least if ownership the equipment is transferred to SPI. > Loaners could be different. > > SPI can of course use it for something different if this is made clear > beforehand as a condition of donating the service.
My comment only applies to loaners. Regarding donations, SPI can do whatever is complient with the SPI bylaws, guidelines etc. > On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > Err, SPI cannot use the service for something different than said before, > > not even if we inform the donor 15 days in advance. > > > > I cannot approve this. -- The only stupid question is the unasked one.
