On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 09:19:26AM -0700, Bruce Perens wrote: > > It clearly insinuated that due to John's criticism of you, you felt that > > you couldn't trust him to run an election. > It was improper process for an election. Especially the posting on > spi-general before my platform was posted there. I did not write > anything about trust.
OK, first off, you do realize by now that I am not secretary and have no involvement whatsoever with the election process, right? If not, please investigate www.spi-inc.org/corporate/board. Having established that, I have no clue what you are talking about with "process". You sent your campaign statement to the secretary, who posted it to the website like he said he would [1]. Nobody ever promised to post your platform to a mailing list on your behalf. If you wanted it posted on a mailing list, you should have posted it yourself. Why do you call me on the carpet for replying to a public document about a candidate? Why do you expect me to post your election document to a mailing list? I am under no obligation to do that, haven't for any other candidate, never said I would, and don't intend to. Candidates can post as they see fit. I am not your secretary. In fact, *nobody* said they would post your document to a mailing list as far as I can tell. Everything I have said in this thread is as "SPI contributing member" only, and I said that up front. Yours here is the first complaint I have heard from anyone about my objectivity as a member of the SPI board and president, and frankly, I am not too concerned about it since you still seem to think I'm secretary. [1] http://lists.spi-inc.org/pipermail/spi-announce/2006/000132.html -- John _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.spi-inc.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/spi-general
