Russ Nelson wrote:
Josh Berkus writes:
> newer projects which joined probably also joined (I know PostgreSQL did)
> under the understanding that SPI was there to support but not direct.
The theory behind SPI's continued ownership of opensource.org is that
the Open Source Initiative is a project under SPI's purview. OSI
doesn't need any of the standard "write checks, provide legal advice,
hold assets", so why does SPI not hand over ownership of
opensource.org?
The theory is that SPI members have the right, the duty, and the power
to withdraw the use of opensource.org from OSI should OSI ever take
actions inimical to the interests of SPI. I emphasize that this is
JUST A THEORY. SPI has NEVER directed NOR ATTEMPTED to direct OSI's
activities. SPI hasn't even ASKED us to do anything, except maybe
stand up a little straighter and get a haircut. However, there is no
reason why this theory should not apply to all SPI projects. Thus, I
should say that your understanding is wrong. In theory, anyway.
Wait, are you saying that in theory, the SPI could take PostgreSQL.Org?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Board candidates should be aware of this.
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
_______________________________________________
Spi-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.spi-inc.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/spi-general
