Ian Jackson wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake writes ("Re: Publically viewable resolutions and increasing
> the visibility of board activity"):
>> Perhaps a better way would be : must be seconded (I don't know the next
>> term) and thirded ;0 by a board member?
>>
>> A vote of the board can be difficult to achieve on short notice. Getting
>> two board members to back something is going to be much easier.
>
> ?? Obviously the procedural vote would be held in the meeting at
> which the item was to be discussed (or not discussed, as the case
> might be). If the meeting is quorate then getting a vote is easy; if
> it's not then you're doomed anyway.
Oh... heh I guess that's true :)
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Ian.
> _______________________________________________
> Spi-board mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-board
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
_______________________________________________
Spi-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
