Anthony Towns <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 07:00:52PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote: > > [...] please would the board confirm > > that SPI will recognise decisions taken according to the Debian > > Constitution as well as those made by the DPL? > > As far as I'm concerned, there's no difference. [...]
I hope that debian is always fortunate in that way. > I think the only case where it's come up is the legal opinion on including > Java in non-free, which eventually happened during linux.conf.au so > I completely forgot to do anything about it. Tsk. I'm not sure how to > summarise or followup on it while respecting/preserving attorney/client > privelege, but I've forwarded it on to John now anyway. Is John satisfied and please will someone let debian-legal know the outcome? Thanks, -- MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Somerset, England. Work/Laborejo: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ IRC/Jabber/SIP: on request/peteble. _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
