Anthony Towns <[email protected]> wrote: > I think this is mostly something that would be helpful for MJ, rather than > Debian as a whole; but I'd certainly expect SPI to have something in its > books making it official how Debian's decisions are communicated to SPI.
I thought it was blindingly obvious that all valid debian decisions would be respected by SPI, but http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2007/02/msg00083.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2007/02/msg00117.html suggests some board members may disagree. I think it could be helpful to the debian project as a whole, depending who is elected as DPL in future, and it's shameful that Anthony Towns is personalising yet again. Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It would be helpful to *me*. > > However, such a resolution needs to address the issue of who should bring a > request from Debian to the board if not the DPL. [...] http://www.spi-inc.org/corporate/resolutions/2002-07-02-iwj.5 makes no similar specification AFAICT, but it could be useful. Regards, -- MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Somerset, England. Work/Laborejo: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ IRC/Jabber/SIP: on request/peteble. _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
