Jimmy Kaplowitz writes ("Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated
Project status"):
> 5. The Board relies on Debian Developers and others to ensure that the
> Board is made aware of Debian decisions relevant to SPI that are not
> communicated to the Board in a timely manner by the Debian Project
> Leader or the Debian Project Secretary; of disagreement among Debian
> developers regarding the identity of the Debian Project Leader or the
> Debian Project Secretary; and of disagreement among Debian developers as
> to the authority held by either of those two Debian officials, but only
> insofar as this authority is relevant to SPI. The Board requests that
> those who notify it of decisions or disagreements in accordance with
> this paragraph take reasonable efforts to look for prior notifications
> to the Board on the same topic, and that the Board not be notified again
> if the new notification would be substantially the same as a previous
> one.
>
> This avoids the inaction loophole you were mentioning, and adds the
> relevance and novelty criteria. Does this work for you
Yes, thanks.
> (and everyone else who's still reading)?
*snort* I think we've bored them away by now ...
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Spi-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
