On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 08:31:22AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > This really isn't true at all. You should consider that at least 4 of > the board members are not "Debian" people, although they are involved > with Debian. (I was firmly reminded of this on a chat with Jimmy).
I think I should clarify for those who might draw the wrong conclusions: all of the board members who are members of the Debian project presumably consider themselves "Debian" people, and I certainly do. However, those who are also OFTC staff members presumably consider themselves "OFTC" people too, even if they are also "Debian" people. Likewise for any members involved in Debian and PostgreSQL; we don't currently have any on the board, but if we ever do, such people will presumably consider themselves both "Debian" people and "PostgreSQL" people. This is consistent with what I think you meant despite the wording. However, it is undoubtedly true that many of the Debian-affiliated board members (hopefully all of them) feel a duty to fairly address the needs of SPI associated projects other than Debian within SPI, as well as those of Debian. I certainly do. - Jimmy Kaplowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
