On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 10:13 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> MJ Ray writes ("Meeting log for 2008-12-17"):
> > [item 7.1, Resolution 2008.12.17.bg.1 - Privoxy as associated
> project]

> For other kinds of resolutions there are of course other isomorphic
> problems.  That is why THE MEMBERSHIP MUST BE GIVEN THE CHANCE TO
> COMMENT!

Wouldn't it make sense to make this argument on -private, where the
contributing members are?

Joshua D. Drake


> 
> Ian.
> _______________________________________________
> Spi-general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
> 
-- 
PostgreSQL
   Consulting, Development, Support, Training
   503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
   The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997

_______________________________________________
Spi-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general

Reply via email to