Joshua D. Drake writes ("Re: Member communications II"):
> On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 09:24 +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Ian Jackson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > DRAFT RESOLUTION 2008-12-19.iwj.1
...
> With all due respect this seems like a motion for the sake of having a
> motion.
I would expect that if the Board passed that resolution we might not
see a repeat of the previous mistakes, where important decisions have
been made without any opportunity for anyone to comment ?
Or do you think you can assure us that we won't in any case see a
repeat of these problems ? And if so, on what basis ? After all
we've been `trying harder' for, well, years by now.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Spi-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
