On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 21:33 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > >> All errors and misunderstandings above are mine :-) > > If we are using a wiki, please make sure it is a wiki that has proper > > page based acl. Which means: > > > A page can be assigned to any role (user or group) and can be controlled > > at that level. If it is like most wikis I know, it can't do that. If it > > can't do that we are wasting our time. > > As much as I am in favor of limiting access: What do you plan that needs > this? I mean, it will be a wiki, but not one thats open to the wide > public. It will always be a limited set of people who have access > to. (Board, Admins and the few people board wants in as webmaster).
O.k. if we are going to limit it like that, then I don't see a big problem. I was envisioning something like wiki.postgresql.org where there is "official" stuff but also it is an open wiki. So only certain people can unlock and lock pages. Just makes things obnoxious. > > And then we have the VCS behind it, which will surely mail commit > messages to a list. And allows easy reverts of broken changes. Etc. > Nod. Joshua D. Drake -- PostgreSQL Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997 _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
