On 05/06/2016 10:02 AM, Bdale Garbee wrote:
Martin Michlmayr <[email protected]> writes:
I haven't seen any conversation with the board about what they need,
what they are looking for, etc.
I don't know how I should vote on a resolution without any prior
conversation at all.
Why hasn't Mark been in contact with the board?
He talked to me. The needs and expectations seemed simple enough that I
didn't think a lot of conversation would be required, but part of the
reason for including spi-private and spi-general here was so that
discussion can occur, so go for it!
The board is not all that responsive as a whole. If someone gets a board
member to talk to them (which has happened here and with myself multiple
times) that should be good enough to at least write a resolution.
Of course it is good to have discourse on the resolution but the idea
that we will discuss everything and THEN right a resolution is why we
have projects waiting since November to be approved.
Sincerely,
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
_______________________________________________
Spi-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
