On 05/10/2016 02:38 PM, Peter Cock wrote:
That sounds like a sensible idea in principle for all future projects.
In addition to having a lawyer review the final wording, I would
suggest there be some minimum time period as well before
the SPI can move earmarked funds under this clause (e.g. six
months or a year)?
Agreed but I also think we need to forgo this option on the pending
resolutions and get a global resolution written for all past and future
projects.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
_______________________________________________
Spi-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
