Hi Jonathan,
On 2018-07-02 10:11, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 09:04:05AM -0400, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
[...]
I dropped the issue at that point, but yesterday I received the last
attached mail, which points to the agenda of SPI's annual general
meeting, which has most of its content in a section with the same
title.
"Face to face action item review". Updates on action items that came out
of the SPI face to face (i.e. in person) meeting.
Thank you
Since this is not the first meeting with content in such a section, if that
section shall be featured again (and I am not saying it should), please:
1. At least avoid collapsing with the "F2F" "acronym"
2. Even better, use the description just given by Jonathan (I for one would not
have been able to figure out that meaning even if the acronym had not been
used.)
3. Ideally, detail when the face to face meeting took place or somehow allow
readers to find what action items came out of that meeting.
Can anyone please explain what this title means? And could something
be done so that replying to mails sent to spi-announce reaches authors
of these mails?
How about instead of sending mails to -announce you send them to where
you want them to go? I rejected your original mail with a message about
my best guess about where you might want it to go, rather than
incorrectly assuming you wanted it to be private, or public, or go
somewhere else.
Yes, thanks, though there is obviously nothing confidential in that mail, so my
preference would have been for it to be public.
If replies to mails sent to spi-announce are not supposed to be sent to
spi-announce, I would suggest either:
1. Setting the Reply-To to where they should go
2. Having the mailing list set Reply-To to where they should go
3. Indicating where replies should go in the list description
--
Philippe Cloutier
http://www.philippecloutier.com
_______________________________________________
Spi-general mailing list
Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org
http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
