Hi,
On 04/22/2012 03:16 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Hi
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Alon Levy<al...@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 01:59:05AM +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
So it seems like we should keep sending repeat key press in fact. And
it's probably better to rely on client-side repeat, since letting the
server handling it may lead to precisely the bug I was trying to fix.
And we should teach the agent to disable the key repeat function,
which is a trival xset -r, or XGetKeyboardControl /
XChangeKeyboardControl equivalent when a client is connected. Any
other opinion?
Using the agent to disable key repeat sounds fine, but you want to do
that for windows as well.
Windows doesn't need change, since it seems to use "hardware" key repeat.
Just to be clear, you propose the client generates the repeat, and the
agent disable the guest repeat, so if there is jitter in the network the
repeated key press events as seen by the guest would have differing time
difference.
Not sure what you mean by "differing time difference", but somehow it
should be under client control whether there is key repeat.
Hans gave a longer reply, but unfortunately, it was only addressed to
me. Hans can you resend?
Oops that was not my intention. I've resend it now including the list.
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
