On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:51:24AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > On 13.06.2012 04:57, Brian Vetter wrote: > > As an outside observer with nothing really at stake here, it would seem > > that rather than Debian providing a hobbled version of the spice client > > that uses raw audio (disables Celt), they offer up a patch for both the > > server and the client that implements a negotiation for either Opus or Celt > > (for backwards compatibility). A spice client without Opus could utilize > > Celt and one that only supports Opus could negotiate with the server for > > Opus. The fall back for either is the raw PPM data. > > 1. Celt051 will not be in debian, for the reasons outlined several times > before. > > 2. I stepped in trying to write a patch in question when the alternative was > to drop spice from debian due to its dependency on celt. I don't know > neither > spice nor celt nor opus to be able to write something more serious. > > 3. We've about a week or two before debian release freeze, after which time > no new software will be accepted into debian. > > Care to explain how realistic your proposal is?
OPUS is already in debian, correct? if spice is accepted with raw audio, and later (don't want to put a date) a version with OPUS support exists, will it be accepted as an update? > > Thanks, > > /mjt > _______________________________________________ > Spice-devel mailing list > Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
