If no further comments, can I move ahead adding that new channel? On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 4:39 PM, David Jaša <dj...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Čt, 2014-02-27 at 18:27 +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote: >> Hi >> >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Jonathon Jongsma <jjong...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> > There's also the option of using a 'temporary' name (e.g. >> > DraftWebDAVChannel or something) until we're convinced that it's the >> > right approach and then rename it to a more official name and advertise >> > it as stable... >> >> >> Imho, we should prefer versioning over "unstable" APIs when possible. >> >> The fact that channel id X will be named DraftWebDAVChannel or >> WebDAVChannel doesn't change much, but perhaps it makes it clear that >> it could be removed/replaced later. >> >> Tbh, this is all hypothetical, the proposed implementation works well >> with both Linux and Windows remotes (but more exposure would help >> finding shortcomings..) >> > > IMO fresh builds in virt-preview repo could bring some extra exposure... > > David > > _______________________________________________ > Spice-devel mailing list > Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
-- Marc-André Lureau _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
