On 09/29/2014 03:30 PM, Jeremy White wrote: >>> If the idea seems sensible, then I'd propose that we work on the Wiki >>> until >>> we feel it stands mostly on it's own, and when we hit that point, we >>> shift >>> the main pages to reflect that. >> >> The website/wiki content needs some reorganization for sure, and the >> manual editing of the static website content needs to be improved. >> The next question is if we want to achieve that with a wiki, or by >> switching to a different 'CMS'. The wiki has the big advantage of being >> already there. I think Marc-André favoured http://jekyllrb.com for the >> static website part. > > Yeah, I worked a bit with Jekyll, and it was nice. I also find plain > html + a nice css (e.g. bootstrap) surprisingly pleasant to work with. > > If we do keep a static component, I'd suggest we establish a git tree > with git hooks that auto update (ala Github sites). And have patches > and/or commit access to that tree be welcome.
A git would probably have less spam :) Actually all of the non popular platforms are probably better (then again, mediawiki had good spam measures for a long time when Daniel was managing it). > > Cheers, > > Jeremy > _______________________________________________ > Spice-devel mailing list > Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
