On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 07:08:40PM +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote: > On 5/11/15, Christophe Fergeau <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:26:20AM +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote: > >> > As this is a similar issue as your patch about the number of channels, > >> > can you double check that on your big endian builds, WORDS_BIGENDIAN is > >> > defined when generated_server_demarshallers.c is built? > >> > >> Oh, > >> > >> I'll double check that. > > > > Did you manage to get to the bottom of this in the end? > > > > Christophe > > > > Oh, yes. It looks like that I had a partially worked version of the > spice (that was not the upstream stuff, so I had missed something)
But is this patch you sent needed or not? I'd be interested in integrating the patches you have for better big-endian support, but this particular one raised some questions about a potential deeper problem, and I don't have easy access to test machines to dig further into this. So feel free to send any patches you have that are still needed for you. Thanks, Christophe
pgpYh8ptZBlhg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
