On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 05:11:04PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Frediano Ziglio <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Frediano Ziglio <[email protected]> 
> >> wrote:
> >> Just a nitpick, I would prefer to have a explicit comparison here: if
> >> (--items->refs > 0) ...
> >>
> >
> > Why not
> >
> >   if (--items->refs != 0) ??
> >
> > I mean, at the end the results should be the same if no errors managing
> > the counters are present.
> 
> I just think the check for > 0 is the proper test we want to do,
> mainly considering that refs is a int (and not a uint)
> 

For what it's worth, we currently have all variants, with the 'no
explicit test' variant being much more common:

$ git grep -- "--.*refs"
server/char_device.c:    if (--buf->refs == 0) {
server/char_device.c:        --buf->refs;
server/char_device.c:    if (!--char_dev->refs) {
server/cursor-channel.c:    if (--item->refs)
server/cursor-channel.c:    if (--pipe_item->refs) {
server/pixmap-cache.c:    if (--cache->refs) {
server/red_channel.c:    if (!--channel->refs) {
server/red_channel.c:    if (!--rcc->refs) {
server/red_channel.c:    if (!--client->refs) {
server/red_worker.c:    if (--monitors_config->refs > 0) {
server/red_worker.c:    if (--dpi->refs) {
server/red_worker.c:    if (!--item->refs) {
server/red_worker.c:    if (!--item->refs) {
server/red_worker.c:    if (!--surface->refs) {
server/red_worker.c:    if (--red_drawable->refs) {
server/red_worker.c:    if (!--drawable->refs) {
server/red_worker.c:    if (!--stream->refs) {
server/red_worker.c:    if (!--item->refs) {
server/red_worker.c:    if (--shared_dict->refs) {
server/reds.c:    if (!--buf->refs) {
server/smartcard.c:    if (!--item->refs) {
server/snd_worker.c:    if (!--channel->refs) {
server/spicevmc.c:    if (!--item->refs)

I personally prefer explicit tests. However, hopefully we'll manage to
get rid of much of this manual refcounting by the end of all this work,
so not really important.

Christophe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

Reply via email to