>> To me, the logical next step would be to modify the Spice API to allow >> Xspice to do everything directly. That would be faster and make for a >> much cleaner interface (not to mention a more sensible use of memory). >> > > What do you have in mind?
Well, I didn't have anything specific in mind; just a vague sense that we could do better, given that Xspice shares process space with the server. I've done some homework now. And after review, I don't think anything I would propose in that space would materially affect this issue. I'll start another thread on Xspice changes, while I still have some of this understanding still in my mind. Cheers, Jeremy _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
