Hi
----- Original Message -----
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:54:26PM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I noted that in recent patches we started using this style:
> >
> > static void
> > function_name(type name)
> > {
> > }
> >
> > instead of the "classic" (in our code)
> >
> > static void function_name(type name)
> > {
> > }
> >
> > Personally I like the first and I don't complain (and other people
> > seems to not complain too) however sometimes it does not fit as the
> > other style is used.
> >
> > Do we agree we can use both styles or we just didn't pay much
> > attention?
>
> The later? I'm often writing functions as the first style approach which
> is not common style in spice*. For the same reason, I don't pay much
> attention of that on reviews.
>
> I would not mind to keep both styles.. or we should really write a hook
> to start checking for code style because this is quite common mistake...
In spice-gtk we use both style, I don't mind, but I have a slight preference
for the first.
declarations are however almost always
static void function_name(type name);
in short, I like glib/gtk style best for no very rationale reasons.
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
