On 01/26/2017 12:56 PM, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
rcc is already deferenced in red_channel_client_get_client so
checking for NULL after that is uselss.
Hi Frediano,
On one hand you're right, it is useless to check if a pointer
is NULL after it was dereferenced.
On the other hand maybe that's wrong and we
should move the call to red_channel_client_get_client
after checking rcc.
It seems to me it's safe to assume rcc is not NULL
here.
I looked at other on_disconnect callbacks, some do
check rcc some don't.
Uri.
Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <fzig...@redhat.com>
---
server/spicevmc.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/server/spicevmc.c b/server/spicevmc.c
index f441822..2039a80 100644
--- a/server/spicevmc.c
+++ b/server/spicevmc.c
@@ -452,10 +452,6 @@ static void
spicevmc_red_channel_client_on_disconnect(RedChannelClient *rcc)
SpiceCharDeviceInterface *sif;
RedClient *client = red_channel_client_get_client(rcc);
- if (!rcc) {
- return;
- }
-
channel = RED_VMC_CHANNEL(red_channel_client_get_channel(rcc));
/* partial message which wasn't pushed to device */
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
