Hi ----- Original Message ----- > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 04:31:20AM -0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > Hi > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 12:55:38AM +0400, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com > > > wrote: > > > > From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> > > > > > > > > Use shorter line, use the common "d" variable for private data access, > > > > add brackets to ease reading the inner block vs the condition, remove > > > > needless != NULL. > > > > > > I'd lean towards NACK for this one, one letter variable names is imo > > > very bad for readability. I know this is widespread in the spice-gtk > > > codebase, but I'd at least rather not expand that usage. > > > > > > > You may rename it "priv", but then you lost the benefit of being really > > short. > > Being really short is a benefit? This is where we are going to disagree :)
Well, in an proper OO language, you wouldn't even have it, it would be like magic! So yes, I like private member being accessed with a very short variable in C. If it's use consistently, there is very little confusion possible imho. _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
