On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:34:14PM -0500, Jonathon Jongsma wrote: > To be honest, to me it feels like the benefit from this change is not > worth the added complexity of generating GEnums and modifying the > channel clients, etc. Do you have plans to use this somewhere? Or do > you just call it from gdb or something?
Was useful during testing when I wanted to get a better feel of what was being sent, something like: red_channel_message(channel, "%s", red_channel_client_get_pipe_item_name(..)); But this was indeed just a debugging thing, and I agree it's quite invasive for a debug feature ;) Would it be more acceptable with no RedChannelClass changes, and instead have a void red_channel_debug_register_pipe_item_type(GType red_channel_type, GType pipe_item_type); (this would populate a hash table which would be used instead of the new RedChannelClass member). This would mean just one added call in each class_init(), the rest of the code could be moved to a separate file, and even disabled by default as it might be a bit expensive. But I can keep that on the side for now, and push it again when it becomes a must-have ;) Christophe
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
