On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 09:52:57AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> The "Requisite" still prevents the socket to be activated with a
> "systemctl enable spice-vdagentd.socket" launched manually.
> You can obviously complaint that users should not do that but
> I don't think that if the system says "you don't have the device
> needed" when effectively don't have the needed device is a bad
> approach. So personally I would like to keep the "Requisite".
> About the "After" I have no idea of the difference that it can
> make.

If you want some strong relationship like this, maybe we should change
it to BindsTo:
BindsTo=
   Configures requirement dependencies, very similar in style to Requires=. 
However, this dependency type is stronger: in addition to the effect of 
Requires= it declares that if the unit bound to
   is stopped, this unit will be stopped too. This means a unit bound to 
another unit that suddenly enters inactive state will be stopped too. Units can 
suddenly, unexpectedly enter inactive state
   for different reasons: the main process of a service unit might terminate on 
its own choice, the backing device of a device unit might be unplugged or the 
mount point of a mount unit might be
   unmounted without involvement of the system and service manager.

   When used in conjunction with After= on the same unit the behaviour of 
BindsTo= is even stronger. In this case, the unit bound to strictly has to be 
in active state for this unit to also be in
   active state. This not only means a unit bound to another unit that suddenly 
enters inactive state, but also one that is bound to another unit that gets 
skipped due to a failed condition check
   (such as ConditionPathExists=, ConditionPathIsSymbolicLink=, ... — see 
below) will be stopped, should it be running. Hence, in many cases it is best 
to combine BindsTo= with After=.

Christophe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

Reply via email to