On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 05:30:46PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 12:58 PM Christophe Fergeau <cferg...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 11:19:11PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 7:58 PM Christophe Fergeau <cferg...@redhat.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 12:00:49PM +0400, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> > > > > > > > > > > Contrary to spice server dependency, spice-gtk doesn't have a known > > > > > minimum version requirement. > > > > > > > > Ideally, we'd still check for some not very old liblz4 to avoid compile > > > > time failures, but the weird versioning does not make that easy :( > > > > > > Indeed, so do you ack that patch or you have more concerns about it? > > > > Is it too tricky to keep the existing check? > > If it's not used or tested, it's just annoying and might be broken. > > It looks like all distros we care about have >= v1.7.3 > https://repology.org/metapackage/lz4/versions
Ok, let's give this a try.. ;) Acked-by: Christophe Fergeau <cferg...@redhat.com>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
