On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 04:01:02PM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Christophe Fergeau <cferg...@redhat.com>
> > 
> 
> Thanks, looking at reply to 9/9 however I think one thing is not clear from
> what I wrote in the commit message.
> The reason is not only that was used in protocol 1 only and now is not used
> but also that it was wrong from the beginning and useless. I would keep it
> if I found it useful.
> 
> > On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 07:10:28PM +0000, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > This option was used in protocol 1 to generate 64 bit pointers.
> > > A pointer in the protocol is an offset in the current message.
> > > This allows the possibility to have messages with pointers with
> > > more than 4GB. This feature was removed and not used in protocol 2.
> > > The reason is that messages more than 4GB would cause:
> 
> Maybe this could be changed in
> 
> "The reason this feature was correctly removed in protocol 2 is that
> having 64 bit pointers in the protocol would require messages larger
> than 4GB which would cause:"

Sure, even though the first version was fine too. I would not make as
big of a difference between "no longer used, and 'harmful'" (this patch)
and "no longer used and harmless", and would not mind removing both,
hence my comment on patch #9.

Christophe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

Reply via email to