I checked the link-it really is a bill that's been bounced about, and will be heard on 4/1/02-so even though it seems like a joke because of the date, it's not a joke.
I'm wondering how a bill like that affects auto makers. Something that affects a market as large as Californias must affect them. And don't they have lobbiests? Laura G. >From: Michael Hargreave Mawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Michael Hargreave Mawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: To Californiaians - [Fwd: CA CO2 regulation / AB 1058 / April > 1, 2002] >Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 19:02:26 +0100 > >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carter >Shore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >Next I suppose that they will attempt to regulate CO2 > >emission from breathing. > > > >With all due respect, the lady sponsoring this bill > >sounds like a real wack job. > >Check the date of the Bill in the subject header... > >ATB > >-- >Mike >Michael Hargreave Mawson, author of "Eyewitness in the Crimea" >http://www.greenhillbooks.com/booksheets/eyewitness_in_the_crimea.html _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx /// [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list /// Send admin requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive /// Send list postings to [EMAIL PROTECTED] /// Edit your replies! If they include this trailer, they will NOT be sent.
