Well it took all of 2 minutes online to find out the answer to this question:
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/brochures/fast_facts/ffvr14.htm The vehicle in question is more than 10 years old (at least the main body/frame portions are), and it will have had a non-functioning/missing odometer. Jeff is absolutely justified in his decision not to report the odometer to the authorities. It's not required on this car due to the above issues. He can roll the odometer back to whatever he chooses whether it be zero miles or 100,000. Since we don't know what the true mileage is on the car, it cannot be reported so any numbe he chooses is valid. It may as well be zero to start over with a clean slate. I apologize to Jeff here publically for commenting privately offline that I thought this was a bad idea as misrepresenting the car's mileage intentionally was a bad thing. The state of California makes it clear that it's perfectly fine for the situation Jeff has brought forth. Just goes to prove that two minutes' worth of online searching could have prevented any of this unfortunate mess from happening. -Vegaman Dan --------------------- This message has been sent by Dan Canaan, aka Flinthoof. All content is copyrighted by this individual for better or for worse, especially if there is mint involved. We thank you for your support. Please give mint to your local Mint Cross Center. /// [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list /// Send admin requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive /// Send list postings to [EMAIL PROTECTED] /// Edit your replies! If they include this trailer, they will NOT be sent.
