Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list
Also you can find a Kaito 321. They are very small. Eton e5 or a pl 660 are great radios to consider Ernie Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 24, 2014, at 10:53, Gian Romani <romanig...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this > list > > Ciao Carl and many thanks for you reply. > For what about a hendeld receiver my reccomendation is Degen model > DE1103, its price is about 50 dollars, you can buy it everywhere in > the web, and its performances are very cool. I'm using a Tecsun PL600 > and it's really not bad. > ciao > > 2014/1/24 Carl Hadley <carl.had...@me.com>: >> Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from >> this list >> >> HI, >> >> Your question and opinion seem perfectly logical to me, and i am sure that a >> co-ordinated effort is easily managed given todays technology and the >> ability to communicate worldwide within seconds via various instant >> messaging programs. Listeners could easily confirm reception and non >> reception areas of any given transmission. >> >> On a separate note i am currently in the market for a new handheld receiver >> does anyone have a recommendation of make and model i should look at? >> Best Regards >> >> Carl Lawrence Hadley >> >> Cell: +351 91 525 2082 >> Email: carl.had...@me.com >> >> >> >> >> >>> On 24 Jan 2014, at 12:17, Gian Romani <romanig...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from >>> this list >>> >>> Good morning. This is my first question: >>> It has been said many times, and now is given to established, that >>> these transmissions are to be received by agents located throughout >>> the area and that one of the strengths of this system of communication >>> of messages is the fact of not having to use special devices to be >>> able to receive. Infact, as we have always said, we just need a >>> shortwave radio, cheap, small and convenient, that does not arouse >>> suspicion. I noticed that in many cases it goes on the hunt for signs >>> of Numbers Stations with instrumentation, and especially antennas, >>> complex and huge, which will surely help to receive distant signals >>> but in my opinion are not logical to use for receipt of NS. That is, I >>> mean, to understand exactly where they come from and who they are >>> eventually destined for the messages, it is useless to resort to huge >>> antennas and professional receivers because I think that we don't have >>> to hunt for the signal to reach the source, we don't have to go as far >>> as possible, but we have to let the signals come to us. Agents who >>> have to receive messages don't use professional receivers and big >>> antennas to wire all over the garden or on the roof. If it's true that >>> agents use little receivers and antennas, with similar devices >>> monitors have to try to find the signals. It is obvious that a SWL >>> with such powerful devices can hear even really far signals, but this >>> is not in the intention of NS programmes. The sense of NS, if we want >>> to understand something more, is to receive them with the same devices >>> used by agents. A signal sent for example from Russia for agents >>> located in Italy is easily receivable with professional receivers and >>> wire antennas cut for the right band. But to understand exactly who it >>> is for that message need trying with domestic receivers and antennas. >>> If the signal is perfectly received all over Italy it means that >>> signal is potentially routed to agents in Italy. If in Italy, with >>> domestic devices, that signal is not receivable, it means that message >>> is not intended to agents in that area. To try to understand where >>> they came from but also where they have to go then is useful to try to >>> do triangulations reception operated by monitors located everywhere >>> and can operate with the same home equipment. Just so we can groped to >>> identify areas of sending/receiving messages. It is correct my idea? >>> Do you agree with this point of view? >>> >>> Bye, Naig >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Spooks mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Spooks mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > Spooks mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
