Visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks to unsubscribe from this list
Hello Gian, I'm a complete newcomer and this is only conjecture, so please keep my comments in proper context: Let's say I was a person who these transmissions were intended for. I would likely have a timetable of sorts with frequencies of when these transmissions would occur. At the appropriate time I would tune my radio and listen: - If I heard nothing at all, I may think that something prevented me from receiving the broadcast i.e. faulty equipment or conditions poor for reception. - If on the other hand if I heard the broadcast, but it indicated that there was no messages I would be clear on that. Of course this could all be subterfuge and the presence or absence of messages could mean nothing at all.. simply a means of keeping everyone guessing. 73, John On 4/9/2014 at 3:42 PM, "Gian Romani" wrote: Good evening everybody, I have a new question for you: I seem to have realized that a lot of trasmissions are empty messages, this means that trasmissions are produced even if there's nothing to send: the name of the recipient is called a lot of time and then there is nothing to be said. Is this a non-sense? Why empty trasmissions are sent anyway? thanks to everyone who will help, ciao ______________________________________________________________ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Spooks mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/spooks Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Spooks@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
