Dear Colleagues,

 

My institution is currently looking to purchase a portable metabolic (CPET) 
system to enable outdoor VO2 testing etc of trained athletes. After a bit of 
investigation I have identified several commercially available systems. Several 
of these systems appear to have undergone peer validation at some stage (many 
of these quite dated) and I have identified relevant studies applicable to each 
system below. The published research seems to indicate most systems 
overestimate VO2 to some extent however this is less of an issue than re-test 
reliability. I am also most interested in the day to day running of the various 
systems, after several colleagues identified reliability issues and ongoing 
maintenance problems (and poor manufacturer back up) with some of these systems.

 

Given the major expense associated with the purchase of these systems I feel it 
prudent to canvas some further opinions from colleagues who actually use these 
systems on a regular basis. 

I would therefore be grateful for opinions and experiences (good and bad) of 
anyone using these systems especially in terms of validity, reliability and 
maintenance issues.

 

I would of course be willing to furnish anyone interested with a copy of the 
responses.

 

Mobile sytems identified and associated studies (but please let me know of any 
others)

 

Cortex Metamax, (Int J Sp Med, 2001; 22. 593-7)

Cosmed 4b (Jsci Med Sport, 2004; 7. 11-22)

Jaeger Oxycon mobile (Jssm, 2008; 7. 532-36)

Med Graphics VO2000 (Open Sp Med J; 2008; 2. 23-27)

 

Many thanks in anticipation.

 

Carl Paton (PhD) [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 



This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.

If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the 
message.

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.

This message has been scanned for viruses and spam by SurfControl RiskFilter - 
E-mail.

Reply via email to