This is an update based on the various DISCUSS and comments received during 
IESG review.

Following (hopefully) have been addressed:

1. more appropriate use of “SHOULD and “MUST” terminology.
2. clarification on dataplanes
3. Manageability section update
4. Security Section
5. Removed comparison between SR and RSVP-TE

Thanks.
s.


> On Mar 1, 2016, at 3:54 PM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Source Packet Routing in Networking of the 
> IETF.
> 
>        Title           : SPRING Problem Statement and Requirements
>        Authors         : Stefano Previdi
>                          Clarence Filsfils
>                          Bruno Decraene
>                          Stephane Litkowski
>                          Martin Horneffer
>                          Rob Shakir
>       Filename        : draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-07.txt
>       Pages           : 18
>       Date            : 2016-03-01
> 
> Abstract:
>   The ability for a node to specify a forwarding path, other than the
>   normal shortest path, that a particular packet will traverse,
>   benefits a number of network functions.  Source-based routing
>   mechanisms have previously been specified for network protocols, but
>   have not seen widespread adoption.  In this context, the term
>   'source' means 'the point at which the explicit route is imposed' and
>   therefore it is not limited to the originator of the packet (i.e.:
>   the node imposing the explicit route may be the ingress node of an
>   operator's network).
> 
>   This document outlines various use cases, with their requirements,
>   that need to be taken into account by the Source Packet Routing in
>   Networking (SPRING) architecture for unicast traffic.  Multicast use-
>   cases and requirements are out of scope of this document.
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement/
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-07
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-07
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> i-d-annou...@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to