Chris -
Agreed.
I will include that in the upcoming revision.
Les
From: spring [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Bowers
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 5:44 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [spring] comment on draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution-00.txt
Authors and WG,
It seems to me that this document should explicitly state how to handle
prefixes and SIDs advertised with different values of the SR-algorithm field.
Here SR-algorithm refers to SPF or Strict SPF, and not the Preference Algorithm
defined in this draft.
Presumably receiving two identical prefixes with different algorithm fields and
different SIDs does not constitute a prefix conflict. It would be good to
make the expected behavior explicit in the text.
Thanks,
Chris
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
