> On Aug 9, 2016, at 5:55 AM, peng.sha...@zte.com.cn wrote: > > Other documents have already addressed this issue,
I don’t think so. Can you point to these documents ? > for example, set L-flag of Prefix-SID Sub-TLV in > draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-05 and contain IPv4 Source Router > ID in rfc7794. the L flag has the solely purpose of indicating the sid contains a local value. Typically it goes with the V flag that indicates a value (i.e.: local label). Nothing is mentioned regarding sharing the same sid among different services. s. > > > Thanks, > > Deccan > > > > > > [spring] WG adoption requested for draft-filsfils-spring-sr-recursing-info > "John G. Scudder" <j...@juniper.net> Sun, 24 July 2016 12:54 UTCShow header > Dear WG, > > As we discussed at our meeting, working group adoption has been requested for > draft-filsfils-spring-sr-recursing-info. Please reply to the list with your > comments, including although not limited to whether or not you support > adoption. Non-authors are especially encouraged to comment. > > We will end the call on August 31, 2015. > > Authors, please indicate whether you are aware of any relevant IPR and if so, > whether it has been disclosed. > > Thanks, > > --Bruno and John > > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring > _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
