Hi Pushpasis,

I agree. The problem/use-case is already described in RFC7855, the required 
protocol extensions are already documented in ospf, isis and bgp drafts, we 
already have multiple implementations, and deployments have been done.

s.


> On Mar 14, 2017, at 8:20 AM, Pushpasis Sarkar <pushpasis.i...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Authors,
> 
> First I must admit that I have not read the entire draft in details... 
> 
> But from the abstract it seems that for the problem that this draft is trying 
> to address, a similar problem is already addressed in the Segment Routing 
> Problem Statement and Use-Case document (RFC 7855, section 3.3.1.1.1. 
> Disjointness in Dual-Plane Networks). And the same has been solved using any 
> cast segments as specified in draft-ietf-spring-mpls-anycast-segment. 
> 
> Request you to clarify why we need the solution proposed in this draft over 
> the one proposed in draft-ietf-mpls-anycast-segments.. 
> 
> Thanks and Best regards,
> -Pushpasis
> 
> 
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net> wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> New draft submitted for "separating routing planes using segment routing".
> Looking for inputs and comments.
> 
> PS: The draft erroneously got submitted as individual and not affiliated to 
> any WG but the intention was to submit it to SPRING WG.
> We will correct it once the submission window opens. Apologies for the 
> inconvenience.
> 
> Rgds
> Shraddha
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 11:57 PM
> To: arkadiy.gu...@thomsonreuters.com <arkadiy.gu...@thomsonreuters.com>; 
> Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>; Arkadiy Gulko 
> <arkadiy.gu...@thomsonreuters.com>
> Subject: New Version Notification for 
> draft-gulkohegde-routing-planes-using-sr-00.txt
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-gulkohegde-routing-planes-using-sr-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Shraddha Hegde and posted to the IETF 
> repository.
> 
> Name:           draft-gulkohegde-routing-planes-using-sr
> Revision:       00
> Title:          Separating Routing Planes using Segment Routing
> Document date:  2017-03-13
> Group:          Individual Submission
> Pages:          7
> URL:            
> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gulkohegde-routing-planes-using-sr-00.txt
> Status:         
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gulkohegde-routing-planes-using-sr/
> Htmlized:       
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gulkohegde-routing-planes-using-sr-00
> 
> 
> Abstract:
>    Many network deployments arrange the network topologies in two or
>    more planes.  The traffic generally uses one of the planes and fails
>    over to the other plane when there are link or node failure.  Certain
>    applications require the traffic to be strictly restricted to a
>    particular plane and should not failover to the other plane.  This
>    document proposes a solution for the strict planar routing using
>    Segment Routing.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission 
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to