I strongly support the publication of this draft. I’m not aware of any IPR related to the mechanisms described in the draft.
s. > On Jun 29, 2017, at 3:28 PM, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigour...@nokia.com> > wrote: > > Hello Working Group, > > This email starts a Working Group Last Call on > draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution-04 [1] which is considered mature and > ready for a final working group review. > > ¤ Please read this document if you haven't read the most recent > version yet, and send your comments to the list, no later than > *21st of July*. > Note that this is *not only* a call for comments on the document; it is also > a call for support (or not) to publish this document as a Proposed Standard > RFC. > > ¤ *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies > to draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution, to ensure that IPR has been > disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and > 5378 for more details). > > If you are listed as an Author or Contributor of > draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution-04 please respond to this email and > indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. > > Note that, as of today, no IPR has been disclosed against this document or > its earlier versions. > > Thank you, > Martin > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution/ > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
