Hi ZhiBo, Excellent question. Thanks for asking.
* O-bit was removed as part of comments during LC of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-12 draft. The comment was that the bit is defined but its usage is not defined. * The plan to bring O-bit definition from SRH specification and O-bit usage from Network Programming document to draft-ali-spring-srv6-oam-00. * Please also note that to keep implementations unaffected, the O-bit position will be kept at the same place as it was defined in the SRH specification. * Please stay tuned to a v01; it will be soon. Should the WG has any other question, we will be glad to address them in v01. Thanks Regards … Zafar From: Huzhibo <huzh...@huawei.com> Date: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 12:56 AM To: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <z...@cisco.com>, "draft-ali-spring-srv6-...@ietf.org" <draft-ali-spring-srv6-...@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org> Cc: Lizhenbin <lizhen...@huawei.com>, Yangang <yang...@huawei.com> Subject: About draft-ali-spring-srv6-oam-00 Hi, draft-ali-spring-srv6-oam-00 says The OAM packets are identified by setting the O-bit in SRH，But I Notice the latest I-D.6man-segment-routing-header has removed O-bit in the SRH extension header. I want to confirm that draft-ali-spring-srv6-oam-00 will also remove o-bit or keep the o-bit in the later version? Ths ZhiBo Hu
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
