+1. Support.
I have read this draft and I think the path segment is reasonable and useful in
the use cases like PM, Bi-directional SR Path and End-to-end Path Protection.
Thanks,
Quan
-----Original Message-----
From: spring [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Weiqiang Cheng
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 11:59 AM
To: 'Loa Andersson' <[email protected]>;; [email protected]:
[email protected]: Re: [spring] to progress
draft-cheng-spring-mpls-path-segment
Hi Loa,
Thank you very much for your review and comments.
The solution in the draft provides a simple and effective way for E2E FM and PM
in the Telecom application Scenario.
The requirements are valid and all existing comments have been resolved.
We authors also hope WG can adopt draft-cheng-spring-mpls-path-segment as a
working group document.
B.R.
Weiqiang Cheng
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Loa Andersson [mailto:[email protected]]
发送时间: 2019年2月10日 16:11
收件人: [email protected]; [email protected]主题: to
progress draft-cheng-spring-mpls-path-segment
Working Group,
I have reviewed draft-cheng-spring-mpls-path-segment and as far as I can see,
it is ready for wg adoption.
There were some comments in Bangkok, but due to the many collisions between
working groups at that meeting I couldn't attend the SPRING f2f.
The minutes are not clear, but as far as I understand, there is nothing that
can't be resolved in the wg process.
/Loa
--
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
