Andy, > On Jul 2, 2019, at 4:14 AM, Andrew G. Malis <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ron, > > Just curious - since draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header is in 6man, > shouldn't this be aimed at 6man as well?
I wondered about this as well, but reading this briefly, this draft doesn’t define any new IPv6 bits, there are two other drafts that do. See: bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr, and bonica-6man-seg-end-opt Bob > > Cheers, > Andy > > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 10:33 PM Ron Bonica > <[email protected]> wrote: > Folks, > > Please review this draft and comment. > > Ron > > > > Juniper Business Use Only > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, July 1, 2019 10:27 PM > To: Ron Bonica <[email protected]>; Andrew Alston > <[email protected]>; Joel Halpern <[email protected]>; > Andrew Alston <[email protected]>; Daniam Henriques > <[email protected]>; Jen Linkova <[email protected]>; Yuji > Kamite <[email protected]> > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-spring-srv6-plus-00.txt > > > A new version of I-D, draft-bonica-spring-srv6-plus-00.txt > has been successfully submitted by Ron Bonica and posted to the IETF > repository. > > Name: draft-bonica-spring-srv6-plus > Revision: 00 > Title: IPv6 Support for Segment Routing: SRv6+ > Document date: 2019-07-01 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 23 > URL: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf..org_internet-2Ddrafts_draft-2Dbonica-2Dspring-2Dsrv6-2Dplus-2D00.txt&d=DwICaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=Fch9FQ82sir-BoLx84hKuKwl-AWF2EfpHcAwrDThKP8&m=nl07p8dP3iQ-0u6rwI1U6jjp_wqSYhsPge2Y6i5Fo5I&s=f9eRsPzrKToGvL0_wpMx9GAiF85cBkn2my6nyMx5_3c&e= > Status: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dbonica-2Dspring-2Dsrv6-2Dplus_&d=DwICaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=Fch9FQ82sir-BoLx84hKuKwl-AWF2EfpHcAwrDThKP8&m=nl07p8dP3iQ-0u6rwI1U6jjp_wqSYhsPge2Y6i5Fo5I&s=i5EeePVTP8VTbcR4Tpnv_hZo97c6qRVc8ZNPyfEDugA&e= > Htmlized: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dbonica-2Dspring-2Dsrv6-2Dplus-2D00&d=DwICaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=Fch9FQ82sir-BoLx84hKuKwl-AWF2EfpHcAwrDThKP8&m=nl07p8dP3iQ-0u6rwI1U6jjp_wqSYhsPge2Y6i5Fo5I&s=CK39cv9JYjduX8ZtyCxs49VG31Ijs5p6Dmz6ka7JDQ4&e= > Htmlized: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_html_draft-2Dbonica-2Dspring-2Dsrv6-2Dplus&d=DwICaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=Fch9FQ82sir-BoLx84hKuKwl-AWF2EfpHcAwrDThKP8&m=nl07p8dP3iQ-0u6rwI1U6jjp_wqSYhsPge2Y6i5Fo5I&s=2Ya6wV9Pug7Yh-vebYFvEsuuY9vpaA9dKNmD6egK8yM&e= > > > Abstract: > This document describes SRv6+. SRv6+ is a Segment Routing (SR) > solution that leverages IPv6. It supports a wide variety of use- > cases while remaining in strict compliance with IPv6 specifications. > SRv6+ is optimized for for ASIC-based forwarding devices that operate > at high data rates. > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > The IETF Secretariat > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > --------------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
