SPRING, Thanks for the review of this document. As with the other document, apologies for the delay in following up. Based on the mailing list replies, SPRING will adopt this document *once the IPR poll has been completed*.
Authors - the following contributors have not yet responded to the IPR poll: - D Steinberg - G Dawra - S Bryant - H Assarpour - H Shah - L Contreras - J Tantsura - M Vigoureux We can't make a more pointed follow up as these contributors do not have their addresses listed in this draft, whilst not required -- they are appreciated for us to be able to follow up on those that have contributed material to drafts. Your assistance with following up here would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, r. On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 11:13 PM Rob Shakir <ro...@google.com> wrote: > Hi SPRING WG, > > This email initiates a two week working group adoption call for > draft-xuclad-spring-sr-service-programming. This follows the discussion > that we had in the last few IETF meetings, and particularly the focused > discussion we had at IETF 104 regarding service chaining and SPRING. > > Please indicate your support, comments, or objections for adopting this > draft by *Wednesday July 10th, 2019.* We are particularly interested in > hearing from WG members who are not authors of this draft, and those folks > that are willing to spend time working on this draft after adoption. > > We are also looking for volunteers who can provide a technical review of > the content of the draft at a later stage of its progress through the > working group (e.g., before WGLC). > > In parallel - we'll send an IPR poll to the working group and authors. The > currently disclosed IPR can be found in the datatracker > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-xuclad-spring-sr-service-programming> > . > > Thanks! > Rob & Bruno. >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
