Hi Huzhibo,

Thanks for review and comments.

The FIB inconsistency and resulting micro-loops in IGP convergence are solved 
using micro-loop avoidance techniques.
The micro-loop avoidance techniques will be applied to all IGP prefixes when 
any change is detected.
When a node/prefix becomes unreachable, this draft recommends not to delete the 
state from FIB.
You bring up a good point whether micro-loop avoidance path should be applied 
to  this prefix or not.
I think it should. I’ll add text to clarify interaction with the micro-loop 
avoidance.

>And then,You say you can providing node-protection via anycast.I don`t how do 
>you that, Any node of TE may be faulty. Do you want to
> configure the same Anycast address on the entire network?

Protection with anycast sids is explained in sec 2.2.
You do not need same anycast sid for all devices.
For ex: The nodes can be paired together and assigned one anycast SID for each 
pair.
Hope that clarifies.

Rgds
Shraddha

From: Huzhibo <huzh...@huawei.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2019 5:20 AM
To: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>; rt...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org
Subject: Reply: Draft for Node protection of intermediate nodes in SR Paths

Hi Shraddha:

   You say can keep forwarding plane longer. I don't know which stage of the 
forwarding state you are maintaining. The IGP determines the node fault by 
sensing multiple link faults. Because the nodes are aware of the link faults in 
different order, the state before the forwarding entry is deleted may be 
looped. Do you want to keep a loop state?

  And then,You say you can providing node-protection via anycast.I don`t how do 
you that, Any node of TE may be faulty. Do you want to configure the same 
Anycast address on the entire network?

Thank you
Zhibo

发件人: rtgwg [mailto:rtgwg-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Shraddha Hegde
发送时间: 2019年11月22日 11:38
收件人: rt...@ietf.org<mailto:rt...@ietf.org>; 
spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
主题: Draft for Node protection of intermediate nodes in SR Paths

WG,

This is the draft I pointed out that talks about solutions for providing 
node-protection.
It covers Anycast case as well as keeping forwarding plane longer.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hegde-spring-node-protection-for-sr-te-paths-05<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hegde-spring-node-protection-for-sr-te-paths-05__;!8WoA6RjC81c!Sb-7-2B3wu3-xnhl0t1lBXUS5SiG8RhD7hocKD88lSzJhxFE03vkai9wCaS_n0Ei$>

Review and comments solicited.

Rgds
Shraddha

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to